Suzan Lamens vs Maria Camila Torres Murcia Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W W W L L
Form
W L W W L W L W L LHead To Head: Lamens 2 - 0 Murcia
They have played 4 sets in total, with Lamens winning 4 and Murcia winning 0. The last match between Lamens and Murcia was at the Copa Colsanitas - Bogota, 30-03-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Suzan Lamens getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Suzan Lamens | 2 |
| Maria Camila Torres Murcia | 0 |
Copa Colsanitas - Bogota(30-03-2024)
| Lamens | Stats | Murcia |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (15-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (4-4) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 73 | Ranking | 863 |
| 64 | Highest Rank | 807 |
| 25 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (300-218) | Career Total W/L | 40% (48-72) |
| $426,753 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Suzan Lamens
Player
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 5 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 13 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:7:6 | Average Match Time | 1:7:6 |
| 52% (43/82) | 1st Serve % | 66% (71/108) |
| 79% (34/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (29/71) |
| 44% (17/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (11/37) |
| 68% (13/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (3/9) |
| 63% (68/108) | Return Points Win % | 38% (31/82) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Katie Boulter
106%
(
69 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tatjana Maria
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Suzan Lamens
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Marie Bouzkova
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maria Camila Torres Murcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Bosio
Player
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
78%
(
47 of
60)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
Player
Mariana Soares
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Bosio
Player
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
83%
(
49 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
21 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
Player
Camilla Bossi
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
11
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
15 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
53
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ana Sofia Sanchez
Player
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
Player
Jessica Failla
83%
(
58 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
Player
Regina Ivana Hagelsieb
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olivia Lincer
Player
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
Player
Paola Lopez
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
0
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
10
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (300/218) | Win/Loss | 40% (48/72) |
| 56% (664/521) | Sets Win/Loss | 41% (107/157) |
| 53% (5717/5072) | Games Win/Loss | 45% (1001/1224) |
| 54% (80/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 38% (22/36) |
| 61% (187/121) | Clay Win/Loss | 42% (26/36) |
| 57% (32/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 14% (1/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 845 | Aces Total | 47 |
| 0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 2447 | Total Double Faults | 219 |
| 1:29:15 | Average Match Time | 1:12:15 |
| 428.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 371.23 |
| 59% (18268/31021) | 1st Serve % | 72% (3740/5214) |
| 62% (11281/18221) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (1997/3740) |
| 43% (5469/12825) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (616/1475) |
| 51% (2100/4135) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (262/615) |
| 48% (14961/31166) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2222/5130) |
| 25% (3/9) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (4/6) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 73% (11/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (27/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (166/101) | Challenger W/L | 45% (27/33) |
| 54% (89/75) | Futures W/L | 38% (21/35) |
| 58% (297/514) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (47/118) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (48/97) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 22% (2/9) |
| 56% (85/151) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (13/24) |
| 91% (274/248) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (42/38) |
| 9% (274/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (42/4) |
| 21% (244/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (78/9) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
